Legal Opinion
Kenmike Theatre, Inc. v. Moving Picture Operators, Local 304
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 8, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The question to be decided is whether the court had the power to enjoin peaceful picketing by the defendants of the plaintiff’s theater to force unionization of its employees. The facts found can be briefly stated. The plaintiff operates a neighborhood motion picture theater in Waferbury and employs seven persons. Two of them are projectionists. There has been no dispute between the plaintiff and its employees concerning hours, wages or conditions of employment. None of the employees are members of a union. The defendants are a union and its officers. They will be referred to as the union. It…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262 v. GazzamSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Aetna Insurance v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Bartlett v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Devine Brothers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 191Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Lavery's Main Street Grill, Inc. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees-Bartenders Union Local 288Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Beckert v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.