Motion Picture Machine Projectionists Protective Union v. Rialto Theatre Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Chief Justice,
delivering, the opinion of the court:
The court below thought it unnecessary to decide whether even peaceful picketing is lawful. It was of opinion that the evidence indicated that the four striking employees had found employments elsewhere which would have been permanent save for the unexpected closing of the Arcadia Theatre: For this, and the additional reason that, under all .the facts, the defendants had no reason to believe that they could accomplish anything by persuasive methods by continuing the picketing, it was concluded that, in law, the strike was at an end.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hughes v. Kansas City Motion Picture MacHine Operators, Local No. 170Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Samuel Hertzig Corp. v. GibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Quinlivan v. Dail-Overland Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fairview Hospital Ass'n v. Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union, Local No. 113Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Bigger v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1946
- Beattie v. BeattieSuperior Court of Delaware · 2001
- Tedesco v. Turner Seymour Mfg. Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1954
- Piasecki Aircraft Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local Number 840Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.