Legal Opinion

H. O. Canfield Co. v. United Construction Workers

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 3, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to secure an injunction against the defendants, unions and officers, agents and members of unions, to restrain certain conduct in connection with a strike of its employees. A temporary injunction was issued. "When the case was tried upon its merits, judgment was rendered for the defendants, the temporary injunction was dissolved and a permanent one refused. The plaintiff filed an appeal. On its application the court, presided over by a judge other than the one who heard the case, made an order continuing the temporary injunction under the provisions of § 5903…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Miles v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. Glover v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
  4. Hutchison v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Foutch v. ZempelIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerdis v. BloetheConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
  2. George Weiss Associates v. Christiani, No. Cv95 070 56 13 (Mar. 13, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API