Legal Opinion

Loper v. Flynn

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1946No. Civ. 12925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTERIDGE, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered following an order sustaining a special demurrer to a first amended complaint without further leave to amend. It comes up on the judgment roll. No general demurrer was interposed, and the order does not specify the ground upon which the special demurrer was sustained. The first ground of demurrer, to wit, an alleged improper joinder of two causes of action, was not well taken, and defendants have abandoned it on the appeal; the second ground, viz., that the specified cause of action was barred by the statute of frauds, was well…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Agostini v. StryculaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Murdock v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API