Roullard v. Rosenberg Bros. Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Plaintiffs appeal herein on the judgment-roll alone from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action to recover damages for the wrongful conversion of a certain crop of peaches. The only question involved upon the appeal is whether or not the doctrine of election of remedies was applicable to this case, and, if so, whether or not the defendaht was entitled to rely upon it as a defense to the cause of action.
Briefly stated the facts were these: In October, 1919, appellants, who were the owners of a certain vineyard and orchard in Fresno County, entered into an executory contract to sell the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fogler v. PurkiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.