McGibbon v. Schmidt
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to compel specific performance of an alleged contract whereby defendant agreed to convey to the plaintiff a certain lot situated in Los Angeles. The court below gave judgment for the plaintiff and decreed specific performance of the contract. The defendant appeals both from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that on November 26, 1906, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract whereby it was agreed that the defendant should convey to the plaintiff lot 132 in the Schmidt Heights tract, situate in the county…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Rodermund v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.