Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Krigbaum

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1915No. S.F. No. 6921PublishedCited by 59 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an action in unlawful detainer and to recover the amount of rent due. The defendants in their answer set up by way of defense an alleged violation by the lessor of a covenant on her part to make certain repairs, whereby they had been damaged in the sum of ten thousand dollars, and also had been compelled to make expenditures to the extent of nine hundred dollars in making certain necessary repairs. They also pleaded the same matters by way of counterclaim and also by cross-complaint. On motion the court struck out the counterclaim and cross-complaint, and at the trial refused them…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Cowell v. LinforthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API