Legal Opinion
Carter v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1956No. Civ. 21753PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
Petitioner is the defendant in an action to recover damages for an alleged assault and battery, commenced by one Greenwood, the real party in interest.
The relevant facts established by the record before us are:
Petitioner is the owner and manager of a restaurant in the city of Long Beach. In August of 1955, Greenwood was in petitioner’s employ as a dishwasher, and while he was engaged in the performance of his duties petitioner assaulted him. This assault occurred on the 27th of August, 1955.
On September 13,1955, Greenwood filed with the Industrial Accident…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Renteria v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.