Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

The Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5(FOP) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) which determined that the establishment of a Police Advisory Commission by the City of Philadelphia (City) was not bargaina-ble and that the hearing examiner’s denial of the FOP’s motion to amend its charge was not in error. We affirm the order of the Board.

The findings of fact relevant to this case, as found by the Board and not challenged by the FOP, are as follows. In October 1993, Mayor Edward Rendell signed an executive order that created…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Township of Upper Saucon v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. City of Sharon v. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. City of Bethlehem v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dormont Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Denver Firefighters Local No. 858 v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API