Legal Opinion

City of Bethlehem v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

The City of Bethlehem (City) petitions for review of a final order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) finding that the City committed unfair labor practices under Section 6(l)(a) and (e) of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA), 1 43 P.S. § 211.6(l)(a) and (e), by unilaterally removing work from the collective bargaining unit, Bethlehem Star Lodge No. 20, Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), without first fulfilling its bargaining obligations under Act 111. 2

This dispute arises out of the City’s decision to reorganize its communications center and implement…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Harbaugh v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Geriot v. Council of Borough of DarbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. City of Clairton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Plumstead Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. City of Scranton v. Fire Fighters Local Union No. 60Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. City of Scranton v. E.B. Jermyn Lodge No. 2Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Alcaraz v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API