Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion By

Judge McGINLEY.

The Pennsylvania State Troopers Association (PSTA) petitions for review from a final order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) that dismissed the exceptions of the PSTA.

Pursuant to Act 111 1 and the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA), 2 the PSTA is the bargaining agent for the Pennsylvania State Police. On October 15, 2001, the PSTA filed a charge of unfair labor practices and alleged:

4. Prior to October 1, 2001, the promotional procedure for promoting to the rank of Sergeant consisted of (1) a written test comprising 35% of total score, (2) a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harbaugh v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pennsylvania Social Services Local 668 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Township of Upper Saucon v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Plumstead Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Park Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. FOP, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API