Legal Opinion
Dormont Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.
Dormont Borough (the Borough) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board), sustaining that portion of a hearing examiner’s proposed decision and order which concluded that the Borough had committed unfair labor practices in violation of Sections 6(l)(a) and (e) of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA) 1 and what is commonly referred to as Act 111. 2 We now affirm.
The Dormont Borough Police Association (the Association) is the exclusive representative of the Borough’s police officers pursuant to the PLRA and Act 111.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Township of Upper Saucon v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Upper Moreland Township District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Fraternal Order of Police Haas Memorial Lodge 7 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ass'n of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- City of Philadelphia v. PLRBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020