Legal Opinion

City of Sharon v. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1973No. Appeal, No. 814 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

On March 24, 1971, the City of Sharon, a third class city, enacted Ordinance 4-71 which required all present employees of the City Police Department, Fire Department, and Department of Public Works to take and pass a physical examination administered by the city’s physician as a “condition for continued employment.” The ordinance further provided that refusal to take such examination shall be reason for a ten-day suspension and continued refusal shall be reason for discharge.1

Prior to the enactment of Ordinance 4-71, an Arbitration Agreement had been entered into by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Geary v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Kramer v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Baxter v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 669 v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Delaware County Lodge No. 27 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Philadelphia Fire Fighters' Union, Local 22 v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API