Legal Opinion

Ross v. Gentry

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1928No. Docket No. 6320PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a decree quieting plaintiff’s title and foreclosing defendant’s interest as vendee in three pieces of real estate. It is appellant’s claim on this appeal that the provision in his contracts of purchase making time of the essence was waived by the conduct of plaintiff and that the said provision was not thereafter reinstated by a proper notice.

One contract covered a parcel known as lot number 9 and the other contract covered lots numbers 21 and 22'. Adding together the provisions of the two contracts, the agreements treated as one, provide as follows: Purchase price,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McNutt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Kerns v. McKeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Davis v. BaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Danziger v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kay v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Vice v. ThackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Union Bond & Trust Company v. Blue Creek Redwood Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API