Legal Opinion
Danziger v. Benson
California Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1917No. L. A. No. 4028PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment.
On April 18, 1910, the defendants, Mushrush, Humphreys, and Sprague, were the owners of a section of land described as section 36, township 12 north, range 22 west, in Kern County. This case involves the rights of the respective parties under certain agreements for the sale thereof. It is a somewhat unusual complication that has caused the litigation. It may best be shown by a statement of the facts taken from the findings.
On the day above mentioned Benson, who had an option from Mushrush, Humphreys, and Sprague, for the purchase of the land, agreed to sell and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Marsh v. Van Allen MarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Law v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Vice v. ThackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Ross v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.