Legal Opinion
Davis v. Baugh
California Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1881No. 7,753PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the Superior Court of the County of Plumas. Clough, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The findings of the Court below were:
“I. That the land in controversy is public land of the United States, not located nor'claimed, nor used by the plaintiff or defendant or either, of their predecessors in interest as mineral lands.
“ II. That some time in 1856, one John B. Fristch was in . possession of the tract of land in controversy, the same being part of a much larger tract.
“ III. That some time in 1864, said Fristch sold to one Knoll all his right, title, and interest in and to one hundred feet front of the lands in controversy, and that thereupon said Knoll entered upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Natural Resources, Inc. And A. K. Wilson v. William J. WinebergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Spencer v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Strode v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.