Legal Opinion

McNutt v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1921No. L. A. No. 6579. L. A. No. 6577PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The plaintiff in this action recovered judgment against the city of Los Angeles, the defendant, in the sum of five thousand dollars for damages resulting from changing and lowering the grade of streets bordering on plaintiff’s lot. Both parties have appealed from the judgment.

The defendant appeals on the ground that the street work complained of was done in conformity with the Street Improvement Act of 1913, and that plaintiff, having failed in such proceedings to make his claim for damages as required by the act, was not entitled to recover in this action.

The plaintiff appeals on the ground…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Alexander v. Mayor of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Strode v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Minton v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API