Legal Opinion

Union Bond & Trust Company v. Blue Creek Redwood Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 10, 1955No. 33618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

This diversity case 1 poses the troublesome question of the nature and extent of the power of this Court, under uncertain California law, to mold a just and appropriate equity decree.

The assignors of the parties litigant, in May of 1946, entered into a timber purchase contract. The contract vendee agreed to purchase from the vendor certain timber lands for a price of $750,000 to be paid out of the proceeds of timber cut, with certain fixed minimum payments.

Their assignees proceeded under the contract. All went reasonably 2 well until $585,000 had been paid by vendees.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harold L. Ward v. Union Bond & Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Union Bond & Trust Co. v. M & M Wood Working Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. United States v. State Box Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1963
  5. Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API