Legal Opinion

Seisinger v. Siebel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2009No. CV-08-0224-PRPublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue before us is whether A.R.S. § 12-2604(A) (Supp.2008), which governs proof of the standard of care in medical malpractice eases, violates the separation of powers doctrine.

I

¶ 2 Scott Siebel, M.D., an anesthesiologist, administered a spinal epidural to Laura Seis-inger in 2002. Two years later, Seisinger filed a complaint against Siebel alleging malpractice. Seisinger subsequently disclosed that J. Antonio Aldrete, M.D., would testify as an expert about the appropriate standard of care.

¶ 3 When the defendant in a medical malpractice action is a specialist,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  5. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API