Seisinger v. Siebel
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue before us is whether A.R.S. § 12-2604(A) (Supp.2008), which governs proof of the standard of care in medical malpractice eases, violates the separation of powers doctrine.
I
¶ 2 Scott Siebel, M.D., an anesthesiologist, administered a spinal epidural to Laura Seis-inger in 2002. Two years later, Seisinger filed a complaint against Siebel alleging malpractice. Seisinger subsequently disclosed that J. Antonio Aldrete, M.D., would testify as an expert about the appropriate standard of care.
¶ 3 When the defendant in a medical malpractice action is a specialist,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.