Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2012No. CR-11-0314-PRPublishedCited by 309 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue presented is whether the superior court must hold an evidentiary hearing when the results of posteonviction DNA testing conducted under A.R.S. § 13-4240 are favorable to the petitioner. We hold that, although the court must hold a hearing, an evidentiary hearing is not necessarily required.

I

¶ 2 In April 1998, four members of the West Side Guadalupe gang — Reyes, Coronado, Isidro, and Cupis — drove in Reyes’s car to the east side of Guadalupe. They stopped at a party of a rival gang, East Side Guadalupe, and a rock-throwing altercation ensued. After Reyes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by309 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-MercadoArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Travis Wade AmaralArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Homer Ray RoseberryArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2014

304 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API