Legal Opinion
Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 11, 2008No. 2 CA-JV 2007-0071PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Manuel M. appeals from the juvenile court’s order of August 13, 2007, terminating his parental rights to his five-year-old daughter, Leila, and his four-year-old daughter, Alayana. Manuel challenges the constitutionality of Rule 66(D)(2), Ariz. R.P. Juv. Ct., which provides the consequences for a parent’s failure to appear for scheduled termination proceedings. He also contends the court erred by denying him an opportunity to examine a case manager for Child Protective Services (CPS) and by considering inadmissible evidence to conclude the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Denise R. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Marianne N. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.