Legal Opinion

Blackburn v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1920No. 23,063PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdeen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The principal question to be determined by defendant’s appeal is whether in an action under the workmen’s compensation act the judgment is sustained by evidence which established the fact that a disease from which the plaintiff suffers was caused by an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.

At the time of his injury, plaintiff was a young man 19 years of age. His evidence tended to show that previous to the injury he was an able-bodied man who had been working as a common laborer for about two years at construction work,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  5. Peoria Railway Terminal Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co. v. RenglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API