Blackburn v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdeen, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The principal question to be determined by defendant’s appeal is whether in an action under the workmen’s compensation act the judgment is sustained by evidence which established the fact that a disease from which the plaintiff suffers was caused by an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.
At the time of his injury, plaintiff was a young man 19 years of age. His evidence tended to show that previous to the injury he was an able-bodied man who had been working as a common laborer for about two years at construction work,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Peoria Railway Terminal Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Carney v. HellarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- F. H. Gilcrest Lumber Co. v. RenglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.