Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal by the claimant from a judgment of the Superior Court in Hartford County, Tuttle, J., which set aside the finding and award of the Compensation Commissioner for the first district in favor of the claimant.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The Compensation Commissioner found that Mr. Hartz was in the employ of the defendant on November 20th, 1914, as a shipping clerk, and during that day pursued his regular duties and suffered a personal injury consisting of a strain occasioned by lifting or attempting to lift a barrel, and that the injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.
The finding of the commissioner recites at length the evidence, but fails to state the facts leading up to, attending, and following the injury.
The finding of a commissioner should not contain excerpts from evidence and purely evidential facts,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Brightman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Hooper v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Voorhees v. Smith Schoonmaker Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.