Legal Opinion

Madden's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1916PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

Honora E. Madden was an employee of a carpet company, which was a subscriber under the workmen’s compensation act, St. 1911, c. 751. The Industrial Accident Board found that, while engaged in the performance of the work for which she was hired, she “received a personal injury arising out of . . . her employment, . . . aggravating and accelerating a weak heart condition to the point of total incapacity for work.” This finding, standing alone, might be considered indecisive. It simply is a *488categorical repetition of the words in the statute by which the result is reached entitling the employee…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Mulvey v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API