Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.'
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This was an action for compensation for an injury sustained by plaintiff while in the defendant’s employment.
Judgment was entered for plaintiff, and the principal contention in this appeal is whether the injury sustained by plaintiff was a “personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment,” within the terms of the workmen’s compensation act. (Laws 1917, ch. 226, § 27.)
The plaintiff testified that he was a common laborer, 49 years old, and that he was subject to epileptic fits, and had been afflicted with such fits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Klawinski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- McRoberts v. National Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.