Mailman's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Appeal from the decision of the Chairman of the Industrial Accident Commission. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.
Proceeding under The Workman’s Compensation Act. Helen B. Mailman, widow and dependent of William Mailman, alleges that her husband died from an “accident arising out of and in the course of his employment” by the Record Foundry and Machine Company.
William Mailman, a night watchman, went to work as usual on April 18, 1917. The following morning he was discovered at the foundry in a state of collapse. He developed pneumonia and peritonitis and after a few days died. His dependent claimed that his pneumonia was traumatic, i. e., the result of an injury and that the injury was due to an accident…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Comeau v. Maine Coastal ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Jacobsky v. C. D'Alfonso & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.