Legal Opinion

Fallis v. Julian Petroleum Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1930No. Docket No. 6272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

By a contract dated February 26, 1925, the appellants leased to the defendant Courtney Petroleum Company for a period of five years certain real property upon which the latter agreed to drill to a depth of 5,200 feet for oil, gas and other allied products, and to pay as rental $2,500 from the first production and one-sixth of all other production. The lessee drilled to a depth of 4,158 feet, whereupon by written assignment and a collateral contract, it delivered possession to respondent Julian Petroleum Corporation. The lessors do not appear to have consented to the assignment. On December…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fisher v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Fite v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API