Bedell Engineering Co. v. Rouse
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
Appeal from judgment after demurrer to first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and motion to file a second amended complaint was denied.
Allegations in the complaint essential to this opinion are: (a) That the plaintiff was the owner of certain personal property; that a verbal agreement was made with the defendants as auctioneers to sell the same, but that to enable the defendants as such auctioneers to sell the property a written agreement of purchase and sale was entered into between them, which expressed a purchase price of $3,600. (b) That the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Crandall v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Kauffman v. Bobo & WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McGowan v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Engle v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945