Bank of Woodland v. Hiatt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Yolo County. Denson, J. After the decision an application for rehearing was made and denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The appellant purchased of one Strong one thousand shares of mining stock, and gave him therefor his (appellant’s) non-negotiable note for eight hundred dollars, payable twelve months after date. It was transferred to the respondent, who brought an action and recovered upon it. This appeal is from the judgment. The defense to the action was that the stock was not, at the time of appellant’s said purchase, or when this action was commenced, of any value, and that ap*236pellant was induced to purchase it by the false and fraudulent representations of Strong. The value of the stock…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.