Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Cullinan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 26, 1923No. 14240PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
In May, 1921, the Exchange National Bank of Ardmore, Okla., sued defendant in error, S. J. Cullinan, Jr,, in the district court of Stephens county, Okla,, to recover a balance of $4,085.57, with interest and attorney fees, alleged to have been due on a promissory note in favor of said bank. .Said note was signed by said SJ. Cullinan, Jr., as principal maker and indorsed by plaintiff in error, Roy M. John: son. The bank also garnisheed certain funds in Stephens county due the defendant, Culli-nan, which was released by the bond of the latter. Cullinan filed unverified answer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Francis v. First Nat. Bank of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hopkins v. . LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Waddell v. . DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Frenn v. NaboursSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Connell v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Cooper v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Eastman Nat. Bank v. NaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.