Legal Opinion

Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of Atoka

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3604PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Atoka County; J. G. Ralls, Special Judge. ' Action by the Oklahoma State Bank of Atoka against T. E. Horne. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

The Oklahoma State Bank of Atoka commenced this action in the district court of Atoka county on a promissory note payable to its order, signed by Atoka Lumber Manufacturing Company, as principal, and indorsed by T. F. Horne and four others. The plaintiff in error, as defendant in the court below, filed an answer in the case on June 12, 1911, which was a general denial, and also set out several matters of affirmative defense tending to show that he was not liable on said note. This answer was not verified, nor was the execution and indorsement of the note denied "by the affidavit of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. McMaster v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Francis v. First Nat. Bank of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Brewer v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shawnee Nat. Bank v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Kennedy v. Beets Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Render v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API