Legal Opinion

Eastman Nat. Bank v. Naylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1928No. 17487PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, C.

This action is to recover on a note in the sum of $6,000 in favor of the plaintiff, Eastman National Bank, and signed by each of the defendants. There was a dispute as to some of the facts, but it may be assumed, as contended for by plaintiff, that the proceeds of the note were for the benefit of an “unincorporated society,” in which all the defendants were interested The note was first signed by Pochel & Strahler, and afterwards signed by Naylor, who signed above the other two, but all signed as makers. The note was executed in the office of the unincorporated society. After the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. McGrath v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Draper v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Cushing v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Garner v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Inter-City Finance Corp. v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API