Legal Opinion

Frenn v. Nabours

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1936No. 25793PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause originally arose in the district court of Okmulgee county, wherein the defendant in error W. H. Nabours filed an action against the plaintiffs in error Adele Frenn, Frank Frenn, and Ida Frenn, to recover a judgment in the sum of $2,875.89, attorneys’ fee, interest, and costs by reason of a promissory note made, executed, and delivered by the plaintiffs in error to the Braniff Investment Company, and subsequently assigned to the defendant in error W. H. Nabours, which said note was secured by a real estate mortgage upon certain lots located in the city of Okmulgee, Okla., upon which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Kingman & Co. v. PixleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Callander v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Barnett v. BodleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. West Nichols Hills Water Co. v. American-First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. STATE, EX REL. DHS v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API