Legal Opinion

Connell v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1939No. 28601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action against Ben Miller to recover on a note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. Plaintiffs alleged the execution of the note and mortgage by Miller and that it was due and unpaid, and prayed judgment against Blilier, and that the mortgage be foreclosed. The parties stipulated that Ben Blilier hadi executed the note in question in the sum of $1,800 and that'it was secured by a mortgage executed by him. In his answer and cross-petition, Blilier alleged that J. Randall Oonnell approached him with a proposition that if he would furnish land as security for a loan, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tracey v. CrepinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Johnson v. CullinanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Patterson v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Johnson v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Central Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Ring v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Ring v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API