Legal Opinion

Francis v. First Nat. Bank of Eufaula

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1914No. 2969PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, McIntosh County;. Preslie B. .Cole, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Eufaula against Edna B. Francis and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Francis brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. The note was signed by the Presbyterian Church of Eufaula, as principal, and the defendant, Edna B. Francis, and several other persons as sureties. The indorsers only were made parties defendant. After the petition was filed, the defendants filed a motion, praying that the Presbyterian Church be made a party defendant, which was overruled. The answer of plaintiff in error, Edna B. Francis, who seems to be the only one of the sureties who answered,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Outcalt v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. McMaster v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Kirkpatrick v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Connelly v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Burnham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Johnson v. CullinanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API