In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gatti
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged Daniel J. Gatti (the accused) with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). The Bar’s charges were set out in five causes of complaint, all of which arose as a result of settlements that the accused had brokered for a group of clients — all sexual abuse victims — in civil actions brought against the Portland Archdiocese, the State of Oregon, and Father Michael Sprauer.
In January 2013, a disciplinary trial panel determined that the Bar had proved three of the five causes of complaint and that, in engaging in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re KlempOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re MunnOregon Supreme Court · 2024