Gedeon v. East Ohio Gas Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.
For the purpose of this opinion the facts, as set forth in the pleadings, and as stated to the jury, must be taken as true.
The theory of the plaintiff’s case is as follows:(a) Tesnow was an employee of the defendant company, and at the time of the accident was engaged in his master’s business and acting within the scope of his employment.(b) In stepping from the left side of his parked car, and, without looking for traffic, starting across the street into the path of an approaching machine close upon him, he failed to exercise the care required by his duty toward other persons upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Hoag v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Pittsburg Reduction Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.