Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. Ivy
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1977No. 76-883PublishedCited by 210 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbeRt, J.
Civ. R. 50(A) (4) provides:
“When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that issue.”
By the same token, if there is substantial competent evidence to support the party against whom the motion is made, upon which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Primes v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Roszman v. SammettOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.