Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Minneapolis, St. P. S. Ste. M.R. Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought under the Federal Employers' Liability Act to recover damages for personal injuries. Defendant demurred to the amended complaint. The demurrer was overruled and defendant now brings the cause to this court.

The defendant contends on this appeal that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the amended complaint for the reasons (1) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) that the complaint shows on its face that the plaintiff has no cause of action against the defendant; that the sole cause of his injury, if any,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Lang v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. OtosSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Olson v. Cass County Electric Co-Operative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. King v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. Columbus Hall Asso.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API