Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1905No. 20,593PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From Cass Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Special Judge. Action by Charles M. Peck against tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtJokdan, J.

Appellee, on January 10, 1903, by a complaint in four paragraphs, instituted this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by him on account of the alleged negligence of appellant railway company.

*538The first and third paragraphs of the complaint were dismissed, and the canse tried on the second and fourth. A demurrer to each of the latter paragraphs for insufficiency of facts was overruled. On the issues joined the case was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned awarding appellee damages in the sum of $2,400. The court, over appellant’s motion for a new trial, rendered judgment upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Wheeler v. ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Wabash Railroad Co. v. HassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Millspaugh v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API