Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,360—(118)PublishedCited by 182 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Jackson county, P. E. Brown, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,995.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action, which was here on a former appeal (61 Minn. 249, 68 N. W. 639), was brought to recover for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant’s servants. The defenses interposed were (1) that defendant was not guilty of any negligence; (2) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; (3) accord and satisfaction.

The plaintiff was in defendant’s employ as a section hand. On the day in question, he and two other section men started easterly on a hand car, to meet their section foreman. In the meantime, another section crew, with plaintiff’s section foreman, had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Lois E. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API