Legal Opinion
Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1942No. File No. 6832PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint in question alleges the employment of the plaintiff by the Institution for Feeble-minded, an institution of the state of North Dakota whose employees are insured under the provisions of the Work men’s Compensation Law of this state. The plaintiff was employed as ward attendant at a monthly salary of $57.20, and was so employed during the month of October, 1940, when the accident…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Matter of Bollard v. EngelNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Claim of Bollard v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- McClure v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Halstead v. Johnson's TexacoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Welch v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.