Legal Opinion

Andrews v. O'HEARN

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1986No. Civ. 10837PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Mary and Mark Andrews (plaintiffs) appealed from the judgment of the district court of Cass County dismissing their complaint, the order denying their motion for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the order denying costs in their favor and granting taxation of costs against them. We affirm.

This suit involves various allegations of medical malpractice against Drs. O’Hearn, Thompson, Harrington, Shook, and Gilbert-son, Fargo Clinic, St. Luke’s Hospitals, The Neurologic Associates, and Radiologists, Ltd. (defendants). 1 Following a nine-week trial,…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hanson v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API