Legal Opinion

Kidd v. Minnesota Atlantic Transit Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 157, Calendar No. 36,835PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

On July 1, 1928, James Kidd, a boy under the age of 15 years, was employed by defendant Minnesota Atlantic Transit Company. Tbe employment was illegal. 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8325. In an action for damages for personal injuries, tbe illegal employment being deemed tbe actionable negligence and being so pleaded, plaintiff bad verdict and judgment on February 9, 1932. No appeal was taken. Tbe suit was defended by United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company alone and under a compensation and liability policy wbicb it bad issued to tbe employer, the Minnesota Atlantic Transit Company. This policy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sargent Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Daly v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Kipkey v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hoffman v. Professional UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark Motor Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kirschner v. Process Design Associates, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McCann v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Board of County Road Com'rsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Beals v. Central Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API