Legal Opinion
Beals v. Central Mut. Auto Ins. Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1934No. Docket No. 19, Calendar No. 37,857PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
Prior to February 18, 1928, Edward Snell had a policy of insurance with the defendant company, paragraphs B and H of which read as follows:
“Notice of Loss.
“B. Upon the occurrence of an accident or loss under this policy the assured shall give immediate written notice thereof with full information obtainable at the time, to the company at its home office. Failure to so notify the company shall relieve the company of all liability hereunder. If a claim is made against the assured on account of an accident, the assured shall give like notice thereof with full particulars. If thereafter any suit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Exo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Kidd v. Minnesota Atlantic Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Board of County Road Com'rsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ross v. Michigan Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Foreman Brothers Banking Co. v. HandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meirthew v. LastMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Hale v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Wolverine Mutual Motor Ins. v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Brogdon v. American Automobile Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- A-1 Cleaners & Dyers ex rel. Sheldon v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.