Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Professional Underwriters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 100, Calendar No. 36,592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against a garnishee defendant. May 22, 1929, plaintiff had judgment in the main suit for $2,800 damages caused by the negligent use of defendant’s electrical permanent waving machine. The judgment has not been paid. Defendants filed notice of appeal within 20 days after judgment and a stay of proceedings for that period was entered. No bond was filed, and for that reason the stay of proceedings was not continued beyond the 20 days. Subsequently a writ of garnishment was served on appellant. It made a disclosure of no liability. Plaintiff made a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kipkey v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hoffman v. Professional UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kidd v. Minnesota Atlantic Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cullamore v. Groneweg & Schoentgen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Gross v. Kubel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933
  4. Riverside Insurance v. KolonichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Riverside Insurance v. KolonichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API