Legal Opinion

Kipkey v. Casualty Ass'n of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 143, Calendar No. 35,805PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

December 11, 1929, plaintiff had judgment against Clarence Jackson for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Defendant, insurer in a policy to Jackson, assumed and conducted the defense of the negligence suit. March 8,1930, plaintiff brought garnishment proceedings against defendant on the judgment. Defendant disclosed and claims that it is not indebted to Jackson under the policy because the contract is for indemnity against loss, not insurance against liability, Jackson has not paid the judgment, and, therefore, has sustained no loss.

The pertinent portions of the policy are:

“(1) T°…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. American Indemnity Co. v. FellbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. SpenceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  2. Miholevich v. Mid-West Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hale v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ray v. MoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Wolverine Mutual Motor Ins. v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API