Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wrightsman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1935No. 23949PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed his petition on April 9, 1931, seeking balance due on salary, declaring on a written contract as shown by correspondence between him and defendant as follows:

“November 23, 1925.
“Mr. Harry J. Brown,
“Tulsa, Oklahoma.
“Dear Mr. Brown:
“Commencing November 15, 1925 I hereby agree to continue your services as general manager of the Wrightsman Petroleum Company and its associated and affiliated companies, and of my personal business, for a period of two years, at a salary of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per year, payable in equal monthly installments; subject to the authority which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Wade v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Walker v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Roach v. DearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wickham v. BelvealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Caesar v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Hugh Breeding Transport, Inc. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API