Legal Opinion

Carter, Adm'r v. Pinkerton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1944No. 31139PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by Tom E. Carter, administrator of the estate of John C. Porter, deceased, to recover damages for the wrongful death of John C. Porter. The action was against Carl Pinkerton and the Highway Insurance Underwriters. At the conclusion of all the testimony the defendants moved for directed verdict, and the court sustained the motion and entered judgment for the defendants.

Plaintiff has appealed and presents but one proposition for reversal, that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendants.

We are of the opinion, and hold, that the cause must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Brown v. WrightsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Caesar v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Wallace v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Carpenter v. SnipesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Hull v. Oklahoma City Baseball Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Pinkerton v. Carter, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API