Legal Opinion

Caesar v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1940No. 29346PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, Antone Caesar, against the defendants, Phillips Petroleum Company and Everett C. Rowe, for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile collision. The trial court sustained the demurrer of Phillips Petroleum Company to plaintiff’s evidence, and declared a mistrial as to Rowe. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment as to Phillips Petroleum Company.

Plaintiff’s action was predicated on the concurrent negligence of Rowe and the driver of a gasoline truck belonging to Phillips Petroleum Company. The car in which plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Brown v. WrightsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. McIver v. AllenArizona Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tyler v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Phoenix Baking Co. v. VaughtArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Fisher v. ReillyOregon Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API